ORTHOPAEDICS

Cementless knee arthroplasty

Currently the only portfolio offering cementless implant technology for both total and partial knee arthroplasty*

Comprehensive solutions for total and partial cases

Our technology aims to serve a resurgence in cementless knee arthroplasty, driven by the potential for long-term fixation through biologic integration, the impact on operating times and the shift to Ambulatory Surgery Centers (ASCs).

Explore a portfolio that aims to offer comprehensive implant options with proprietary 3D-printed Advanced Porous Titanium and unique anchor technology.

Product Features

Medical Education

No Results Message
No Results Message

Disclaimer

*The ENGAGE Cementless Partial Knee System is currently available in the US only.

Products may not be available in all markets because product availability is subject to the regulatory and/or medical practices in individual markets. Please contact your Smith+Nephew representative or distributor if you have questions about the availability of Smith+Nephew products in your area.

Citations

1. Fenwick S, Wilson D, Williams M, et al. A load bearing model to assess osseointegration of novel surfaces - A pilot study. World Biomater Cong, Amsterdam, NL, May 28-Jun 1, 2008, 233.

2. Smith & Nephew 2015. NCS29.

3. Westich, GH, Laskin RS, Haas SB, Sculco TD. Resection Specimen Analysis of Tibial Coverage in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Rel Res. 1994;309:163-175.

4. Shah S, Agarwal N, Jain A. MRI Based Comparison of Tibial Bone Coverage by Five Knee Prosthesis: Anthropometric Study in Indians. J Arthroplasty. 2015;30:1643-1646.

5. Martin S, Saurez A, Ismaily S, et al. Maximizing Tibial Coverage Is Detrimental to Proper Rotational Alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472:121–125.

6. Westrich GH, Haas SB, Insall JN, Frachie A. Resection specimen analysis of proximal tibial anatomy based on 100 total knee arthroplasty specimens. J Arthroplasty. 1995;10:47–51.

7. ODEP. Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel. Available at http://www.odep.org.uk. Accessed 04 August 2021.

8. Crook PD, et al. Initial Stablilty of Cemented vs Cementless Tibial Components Under Cyclic Load. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 2017; 2556-2562.

9. Bhimiji S, et al. Micromotion of Cementless Tibial Baseplates: keels with Adjuvant Pegs Offer More Stability Than Pegs Alone. Journal of Arthroplasty, 2014.

10. Engage document 101-09036-01: Tibia Tray Stability Evaluation on file.

11. Engage document 101-09911-004: Anchor Compression Test Protocol. 12. Engage document 101-09912-009-01: Static Tibia Cadaver Strength. 13. Engage document 1906527.000_0138. Biomedical testing report.

Title

Text

Explore